[EAS] Changing Required Test

[Alan Kline]

Agreed, as far as moving out of overnights. One also has to keep in mind 
that the periodic tests are not only intended to verify proper equipment 
operation, but also proper training of the staff. I realize that that's 
a bit problematic for radio stations that run unattended, but for those 
of us on the TV side who do still staff 24/7, it's important to ensure 
that all the operators, not just the overnight guy, are trained and have 
an occasional opportunity to exercise that training.

I can't agree, however, on having to report each and every RWT to the 
FCC on a web form. That's why we maintain logs. I can understand 
reporting in unusual cases, like the national test, but for routine 
state and local tests, what's the point? We know that overall, the state 
and local systems work, and the problem on 11/9 was above that level. So 
what is gained by reporting every RWT?

ak

On 11/28/2011 10:48 PM, Edward Ford wrote:
> I think Bill Ruck's ideas make sense, but I'd agree with Alex Hartman to move them out of overnights.  I don't see a problem with reporting test results on the FCC website as was done with the national test.