[BC] Maintanence Log

[Mike McCarthy]

Ahhh...near 100% eh?  (GR)

If you re-read my post, I capitalized the reference to the formal FCC
compulsory version and left the generic lower case to distinguish the
difference. FWIW, my daily transmitter monitoring document is referred to
as an inpsection template which the staff fills in data. While I'm sure
some $400/hr lawyer could likely conjure up some synomatic linking, I too
avoid the term "log" in anything not FCC mandated to be referred to as
such.

Never the less, the template is structured in such a manner it could be
used as an object of evidence in a proceeding (signature, date, time {as
needed} data entry). But it's still not referred to as a log anywhere.

MM

> On Friday 10 February 2012 12:25:08 pm Mike McCarthy wrote:
>> OK...  Let's be really careful.
>
>> Then there is the non-compulsory maintenance log which covers everything
>> else.
>
>  As usual, Mike and I are in near 100% agreement.
>
>  *I* would never refer to a maintenance record with the word "log" in
>  any context anymore, and for reasons previously elaborated on
>  this very list. ( prima facia evidence of a falsified log at minimum )
>
>  programs actually played, it's understood to be the opposite, and
>  is really a schedule of what programs will probably play, unless
>  circumstances dictate otherwise.
>

>