[BC] They can't give 'em away!
Broadcast List USER
Broadcast at fetrow.org
Sat Sep 20 23:18:07 CDT 2008
I agree we cannot know what audio quality does to TSL. I have had
more than a few arguments with PDs about high frequency limiting and
clipping. Most of them were DJs who long ago fried their high
frequency hearing, and men don't hear high frequencies as well as
women BEFORE the abuse men take to their ears.
I would argue that we cannot do what they were wanting because we
didn't want to drive away women. It nearly always worked, at least
to some extent. I have mostly protected my ears, wearing ear plugs
in loud places, especially concerts, and watching out for what I have
done to myself. As a kid, I could hear traffic signal sonar, and the
motion detectors in stores for the alarm systems, though it is no
longer that good. Clipping drives me nutz, though I have been forced
to use too much under some PDs.
On iPods (or MP3s in general), I can listen to my own rips all day,
and do. Then again, I rip at 320 kbps AAC, and while I still hear
some bad stuff going on, it isn't THAT bad. HOWEVER, I do plan to re-
rip my CDs using "Apple Lossless."
Back in the day, I was able to listen to very good recordings done
with very high sample rate (180 kHz and up) Delta Modulation, and
compare it with 16 bit linear at 44.1 and 48 kbps. Too bad we didn't
go with the harder to explain high sample rate Delta Modulation. I
have many Telarc / Soundstream disks on vinyl AND the CDs of the same
works. I don't believe it myself, but the LPs sound better (I have a
Lynn Sondek LP12 turntable with a Keith Monks arm and a verity of top
arms mounted with several Decca cartridges, plus some Grado and even
high end Shure arms, followed by a db systems phono pre-amp, which is
the only phono pre-amp I found that sounds better than the Straight
Wire Audio cards).
Friends have found the same thing.
Our MP3 sampling rates are FAR too low, as is our CD rate. Too bad.
Unless SACD or DVD-A take off, we are forever stuck with audio that
isn't as good as it could sound.
Then again, if the record companies cannot get their heads out of
their donkeys, there won't be a record industry to feed my music
addiction.
On Sep 20, 2008, at 6:00 AM, broadcast-request at radiolists.net wrote:
> Message: 8
> From: Rich Wood <richwood at pobox.com>
> <20080919170629.30FF762D09 at a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> ------ At 10:12 PM 9/18/2008, SteveOrdinetz wrote: -------
>
>> Most listeners will just tune away if your audio sounds bad. They
>> won't necessarily be able to put their finger on why, but if your
>> station is annoying to listen to so they'll go elsewhere.
>
> Exactly! That's one of the major reasons we'll never know for sure if
> digital artifacts contribute to listener fatigue. From my regular
> retailer visits customers I've asked say they can listen to CDs all
> day. They feel the need to take a break from the iPod every once in a
> while. None could explain why.
>
> Rich
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list