[BC] The FCC bends over...AGAIN
dean tiernan
dtiernan at gmail.com
Fri Oct 26 09:07:37 CDT 2007
ssage: 13
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:04:08 -0400
From: Peter Moncure <pmoncure at radiosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [BC] The FCC bends over...AGAIN
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Message-ID: <472104C8.4060703 at radiosoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
My local coop (very rural, and I'm their last customer!) is very
actively in the Internet business. It deployed 802.11 radio systems,
dial-ups and had planned a big rollout of BPL. But it took the sensible
precaution of testing the hardware, has now scrapped the whole BPL
project, and is swiftly pursuing fiber to the home, at which it will be
eminently successful. Fiber is cheap, it's the interface to the house
that's expensive, but this will come down.
BPL is dead, well-deservedly. And FCC? They are so saddled with
lawyers that it seems unlikely they will be able to respond to
technological progress, becoming dangerous Luddites.
-- Peter Moncure, VP RadioSoft 706.754.2725 -2745 FAX
PMoncure at RadioSoft.com ...a Customer Friendly Company
-----------------------------
It shouldn't be too tough to pick up the first generation NIMs (network
interface something er other Demarc device) that Verizon rolled out.
They are replacing them as quickly as they are found in customer
locations. These should be relatively inexpensive. Newer ones have some
moca applications and remote reboot capabilities the older ones down't.
Hopefully they will invest in larger backup batteries than Verizon (that
last more than 5 hours). If I were building a system from scratch would
put the power at the co where there's plenty of battery power and bypass
a major support pita. Now Mrs Jones know you are 95 but, before I send a
field tech would you go to the basement and see if you have power to the
NIM? Yikes?
dean formerly of Verizon and looking
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list