[BC] Calculating machines
Robert Orban
rorban at earthlink.net
Fri Oct 5 23:22:50 CDT 2007
At 03:52 PM 10/5/2007, you wrote:
> Robert Orban wrote:
>
>>This experience brings back memories of HP's superb build quality
>>back when it was still mainly a test and measurement instrument
>>company. Of course, it cost $395 in 1972 dollars, which is $1838 in
>>today's dollars.
>>
>>May the HP45 live for another 30 years!
>
>
>What's scary is that you can get one today at the dollar store that
>will probably out-perform it.
In terms of features, this is no doubt true. However, the HP
calculator keyboards of the time had a very special feel to the keys
that HP has had trouble reproducing when they went to Chinese
contract manufacturing for their present-day calculators. Moreover,
the build quality of the old HPs is far better than any "dollar
store" calculator. And I like the 45's LED display, which is readable
at any angle, unlike LCDs.
That being said, HP finally got it right (except for the LCD display)
with the new HP 35s, which has the same form factor as the old HP-35
and HP-45 but of course has far more power. When I first saw this
calculator announced for sale, my inner geek kicked in and I bought
one. They're about $60 and I felt that it was money well spent. For
me, the main improvement over the 45 was direct entry of complex
numbers and full support for complex arithmetic, including
transcendental functions on complex arguments. The programmability
doesn't interest me much; that's what computers with big displays are for.
Bob Orban
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list