[BC] IBOC AM Quality

[Glen Kippel]

On 3/23/07, padrino <padrino at telos-systems.com> wrote:
>
>
> Even though there is no free lunch, in any tech, HD on AM is perceived by
> *most* who hear it as an improvement over conventional AM audio.
>
> I support Jim's original comments, as those parallel what I have heard
> from casual consumers who have heard HD on AM.
>
> ---------------


I suppose it will have to be up to the potential listeners to decide whether
processing artifacts are better than the occasional static crashes.  In any
case, "HD on AM" is somewhat of an anomaly -- shouldn't it be "HD on MW"?