[BC] Re: Public File

[Robert Meuser]

We have discussed this in the past. Yes, the FCC DOES want the daytimers 
gone. That is why you can not license a new one.

R


Bailey, Scott wrote:

>You have got to be joking!  AM Daytimers are not going to get squat! It
>will be the Class C AM's (old Class IV) that will be getting the FM
>Translators! The reason is because the FCC sees them as FULL TIME
>facilities.  We have to sign off or go to UNPROTECTED flea power at
>night.
>The past 2 examples have proven my point in comments I made to the FCC
>so far in that rule making they had on this issue! Me thinks that they
>want us Class D Daytimers to all go dark! Less worry for them and less
>for them to keep up with!
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
>[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of
>RokprtMike at aol.com
>Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:29 PM
>To: broadcast at radiolists.net
>Subject: [BC] Re: Public File
>
> 
>In a message dated 3/8/2007 1:30:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
>broadcast-request at radiolists.net writes:
>
>Actions  like this, and the public file fine against Holy Cross College
>in 
>Worchester  last year will eventually leave the reserved band a desert 
>wasteland.   Nothing but National Liberal Radio, preachers, and holy
>rock from  
>satellite-fed stations.
>
>
>
>Perhaps or change the rules, allow AM daytimers to apply for this space.
>
>Maybe even auction it off. The way the rules are being enforced or not
>leads me  
>to believe that all bets are off. 
> 
>Why wait for a ruling from the FCC on FM translators on the AM band
>when you 
>get a better ROI by simply contacting your local  in Congress.
> 
>Mike Hemeon
><BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers
>free 
>email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
>http://www.aol.com.
>  
>