[BC] Documented harmful interference

[Phil Alexander]

On 19 Jan 2006 at 16:37, WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 01/18/2006 8:44:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
> dpuopolo at usa.net writes:
> 
> > Now remember, I'm not talking about interference in distant locations with
> >  weak coverage contours. I'm talking about OBLITERATION within city grade (5
> >  and 10 mV/m) contours.
> >  
> >  Can anyone explain to me why this scenario is a good thing for radio in
> >  general and AM radio in particular??
> 
> Dana, why haven't they sued? Seriously. I think they may have a case. Time to 
> speak to Counsel.

Willie,

There are deep pockets, and there are deeper pockets. Restraint of trade easier
to see than prove, or so I've been told. MTV can make their counsel rich and
probably not impact their EPS in any visible way.


Phil Alexander, CSRE, AMD
Broadcast Engineering Services and Technology 
(a Div. of Advanced Parts Corporation) 
Ph. (317) 335-2065   FAX (317) 335-9037





-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 1/18/06