[BC] Mono Expands on the FM Band
R J Carpenter
rcarpen
Tue Jan 17 15:24:43 CST 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: <nakayle at gmail.com>
> A old time engineer told me that the FCC made a major mistake in
> choosing
> the GE/Zenith FM stereo system over the Murray Crosby system. The
> Murray
> Crosby system worked better and had much less hiss at low signal
> levels but
> it was opposed by broadcasters because it interfered with 67-Khz SCA
> music
> services which was a major revenue source for FM broadcasters at the
> time.
> A short-sighted decision I think in retrospect.
I disagree. I characterized the present stereo system as the "best
mono stereo system" back when it was introduced. It sacrificed less
mono coverage than other proposals - and receivers now fade to mono
when the going gets rough to take advantage of this fact.
I built the first stereo station in the DC area, 102.3. We had very
serious coverage problems, partly because of the stereo. But today
102.3 is frequently #1 in ratings. How can this be? First off, they
moved to a far better transmitter location that we counld not afford.
Second, the FCC had increased the power of Class A stations six-fold
from when we went on the air - and no one had circular polarization
back then so the result is really a 12-fold power increase.
So I feel that choosing the present stereo system was among the FCC's
better decisions.
bob carpenter
-
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list