[BC] A bit disappointed.

[WFIFeng@aol.com]

In a message dated 01/15/2006 5:22:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
Robertm at broadcast.net writes:

> >Lowered how far, though? Certainly not to the point of planting 
white-noise 
>  >generators on either side of every station?
>  >
>  >
>  How about 7 k mono audio all in the channel and not interfering with 
>  even a first adjacent station.

Hmmm... is this after the analog is turned off, and it's 100% digital?

I still think analog AM should not go away completely. It's reliable, 
long-range capability is something worth preserving, IMHO.



>  >> You are still thinking old school traditional radio. Aim higher.
>  >
>  >HUH? Now I'm completely lost.
>  >
>  
>  Don just think of the typical formats we have now.

Ok, I need a little clarification, here... what formats do you mean? 
Programming formats, or modulation/delivery formats?

I am aware of the ongoing development of PCS technology toward more digital 
bandwidth & thus on-demand/interactive streaming content. Although completely 
different from IBUZ, is it something in this vein?

Willie...