[BC] A bit disappointed.

[Robert Meuser]

WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 01/15/2006 5:22:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
> Robertm at broadcast.net writes:
> 
> 
>>>Lowered how far, though? Certainly not to the point of planting 
> 
> white-noise 
> 
>> >generators on either side of every station?
>> >
>> >
>> How about 7 k mono audio all in the channel and not interfering with 
>> even a first adjacent station.
> 
> 
> Hmmm... is this after the analog is turned off, and it's 100% digital?
> 
> I still think analog AM should not go away completely. It's reliable, 
> long-range capability is something worth preserving, IMHO.
> 


No in hybrid mode. All digital could do more.


> 
> 
> 
>> >> You are still thinking old school traditional radio. Aim higher.
>> >
>> >HUH? Now I'm completely lost.
>> >
>> 
>> Don just think of the typical formats we have now.
> 
> 
> Ok, I need a little clarification, here... what formats do you mean? 
> Programming formats, or modulation/delivery formats?
> 

Programming - just stop thinking like Rich and you will be starting down the 
right path.



> I am aware of the ongoing development of PCS technology toward more digital 
> bandwidth & thus on-demand/interactive streaming content. Although completely 
> different from IBUZ, is it something in this vein?


Shannon will allow you to go only so far and at MW freqs we are probably pushing 
the limit.



R