[BC] Multiple ISDN Question

[Dana Puopolo]

You are correct - and that's why I chose Verizon DSL on both ends.
Basically, the TX is in Philadelphia and the control point in the Boston
suburbs.

The link from the local studio is not DSL however, because due to the distance
to the CO, Verizon could only provide 1500/384 DSL there, and we needed a
larger upload there, 
because we are streaming the LP1 and LP2 EAS back to Boston.
We stream back tp Boston the two EAS stations, the local studio feed and the
output of an AM tuner set to the station for air monitor in Boston.
For this I use Comcast business cable with static IP addresses.
This has gne out once - for about ten minutes.

-D

------ Original Message ------
Received: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:36:56 PM EST
From: Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [BC] Multiple ISDN Question


Then you are really not doing this on the internet. You are doing it 
within Verizon's core infrastructure. There is a difference

R

Dana Puopolo wrote:

>It works like a charm. We're using Verizon DSL on each end. The Barix
>Exstreamers will look for an alternate/third URL if they lose the feed on
the
>main one. 
>
>Though the DSL at The transmitter end has been flawless, I do plan to add
>cable Internet and a dual WAN router in the future for automatic backup.
>
>Additionally, I want to run a second static IP address cable Internet
>connection at the atudio to originate a second feed.
>
>the MPEG-2 feed (mono) is only about 70 kbit. a small fraction of the 1500
>kbit capability of the DSL. 
>
>We also use a (free) VOIP telephone there to run the Sine Systems Remote
>control.
>
>-D 
>
>------ Original Message ------
>Received: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 02:21:22 PM EST
>From: "Bernie Courtney" <jerseyspikes at gmail.com>
>To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>Subject: Re: [BC] Multiple ISDN Question
>
>your a more daring person then I.  I wouldn't use the public Internet for an
>STL unless due to some catastrophic event it was the only means left
>temporarily.  And even then I'd still take the Access unit because bit for
>bit you'd using less bandwidth then using the Barix boxes with MPEG.
>
>bernie
>
>On 12/3/06, Dana Puopolo <dpuopolo at usa.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>Barix is UDP with a large (2-4 second) buffer. Error concealment is used.
>>They use MPEG 2 for a codec (not MP2).
>>We've been using them for a major market AM STL over the public Internet
>>for
>>several months without a single glitch.
>>
>>-D
>>
>>------ Original Message ------
>>Received: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:22:10 PM EST
>>From: "Bernie Courtney" <jerseyspikes at gmail.com>
>>To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>>Subject: Re: [BC] Multiple ISDN Question
>>
>>but I'd take their BRIC algorithm and the reliability it brings with it
>>over
>>the Barix boxes anyway for broadcast applications over a public network.
>>
>>b
>>
>>    
>>

_______________________________________________

The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More! 
www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com