[BC] Multiple ISDN Question

[Bernie Courtney]

And in a REAL emergency do you really think those connections are gonna hold
up?  That sounds like a very scary setup of far too many eggs riding in the
same basket to me.

bernie

On 12/3/06, Dana Puopolo <dpuopolo at usa.net> wrote:
>
> because we are streaming the LP1 and LP2 EAS back to Boston.
> We stream back tp Boston the two EAS stations, the local studio feed and
> the
> output of an AM tuner set to the station for air monitor in Boston.
> For this I use Comcast business cable with static IP addresses.
> This has gne out once - for about ten minutes.
>
> -D
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:36:56 PM EST
> From: Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net>
> To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
> Subject: Re: [BC] Multiple ISDN Question
>
>
> Then you are really not doing this on the internet. You are doing it
> within Verizon's core infrastructure. There is a difference
>
> R
>
> Dana Puopolo wrote:
>
> >It works like a charm. We're using Verizon DSL on each end. The Barix
> >Exstreamers will look for an alternate/third URL if they lose the feed on
> the
> >main one.
> >
> >Though the DSL at The transmitter end has been flawless, I do plan to add
> >cable Internet and a dual WAN router in the future for automatic backup.
> >
> >Additionally, I want to run a second static IP address cable Internet
> >connection at the atudio to originate a second feed.
> >
> >the MPEG-2 feed (mono) is only about 70 kbit. a small fraction of the
> 1500
> >kbit capability of the DSL.
> >
> >We also use a (free) VOIP telephone there to run the Sine Systems Remote
> >control.
> >
> >-D
> >
> >------ Original Message ------
> >Received: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 02:21:22 PM EST
> >From: "Bernie Courtney" <jerseyspikes at gmail.com>
> >To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
> >Subject: Re: [BC] Multiple ISDN Question
> >
> >your a more daring person then I.  I wouldn't use the public Internet for
> an
> >STL unless due to some catastrophic event it was the only means left
> >temporarily.  And even then I'd still take the Access unit because bit
> for
> >bit you'd using less bandwidth then using the Barix boxes with MPEG.
> >
> >bernie
> >
> >On 12/3/06, Dana Puopolo <dpuopolo at usa.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Barix is UDP with a large (2-4 second) buffer. Error concealment is
> used.
> >>They use MPEG 2 for a codec (not MP2).
> >>We've been using them for a major market AM STL over the public Internet
> >>for
> >>several months without a single glitch.
> >>
> >>-D
> >>
> >>------ Original Message ------
> >>Received: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:22:10 PM EST
> >>From: "Bernie Courtney" <jerseyspikes at gmail.com>
> >>To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
> >>Subject: Re: [BC] Multiple ISDN Question
> >>
> >>but I'd take their BRIC algorithm and the reliability it brings with it
> >>over
> >>the Barix boxes anyway for broadcast applications over a public network.
> >>
> >>b
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More!
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More!
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>