[BC] Audio "proofs"

[Mike Callaghan]

Agreed.  I wanted to see what the new system would do.  Today's STLs and exciters are capable of so
much more than what I grew up with, it is a shame we don't have better source material.  Nonetheless,
after the stereo proof was done each year at KPPC, we did play a Deutsche Grammophone recording of the '1812'
before we put the processing back in.  It was sponsored by Dow Hi-Fi in Pasadena, and they publicized it.

On 11/19/2010 12:28 PM, Thomas G. Osenkowsky wrote:

>While I agree that source material today is lacking in quality, I do believe
>the vehicle (radio station) which transports that material should not
>contribute to any additional degradation. Many anomalies were found during
>audio proofs when they were required. It is still a good, but seldom
>practiced, exercise.

>Tom Osenkowsky, CPBE

>>We agreed that NO ONE does audio measurements anymore.
>>With today's programming, why bother ??