[BC] The Return of Improper Use of EAS Tones

[Cowboy]

On Monday 08 November 2010 09:11:29 pm Alan Peterson wrote:
> 
> In the closing seconds of the spot, unmistakable EAS tones were woven
> through the soundtrack as a dramatic punctuator to the musical and effect
> underscore. And it was loud - it certainly wasn't buried in the underscore.

 Please clarify ?
 Tones, or duck-farts ?
 The old two-tone, I'd have to look up the current rule.
 Duck-farts are NOT an attention signal, although we sometimes
 assume they are since they seem to also serve that purpose.

 Now, if they are duck-farts, AND they actually decode into something,
 then it becomes a very risky premise indeed.
 Something about "false or deceptive signal."

 Remember, jot and title !
 We are a nation of law, not of common sense and/or intelligence.


-- 
Cowboy