[BC] Transmitter Safety
DHultsman5 at aol.com
DHultsman5 at aol.com
Thu May 1 07:17:49 CDT 2008
In a message dated 4/29/2008 1:13:37 PM Central Daylight Time,
jeff at rfproof.com writes:
The 120 supply should have been off the three
phase in some manner, preferably a transformer.
*********************
In my opinion this transmitter especially in the combined mode had too many
places to get bit by AC and DC. Also it had too many hidden fuses in the
center cabinet.
As a straight 20 kW. there was a seperate feed for the three phase power
supply. Then the rest of the transmitter cabinet was fed from a 220 V single
phase breaker.
Now take two transmitter and there are four breakers required. The center
cabinet probably had a 220 V breaker and a 110 V breaker, plus all of the
remote controls were at 110 VAC. To turn everything off there were six breakers.
I also personally got bit by the bias supply and had another engineer bit by
the 2 kW supply for the 250B's due to a stuck contactor on that rig. The main
3 phase was turned off buy not the low voltage 220 V single phase breaker.
Collins and Continetal have only one breaker to turn off and it all went
away even in the external supply transmitters.
Glad most of these are gone or in backup mode. I love today's transmitters
with low voltage DC remote control circuits. I don't know how many times I
have been bit on the terminal boards of remote control units in the back of
racks that switch 110 or 220 VAC to transmitters and phasors.
Dave
**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car
listings at AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list