[BC] X-lators for Daytimers (WAS:NAB Newsletter)

[Bailey, Scott]

Willie,
  What bugs the crap out of me is WCRT-AM (1160) in Nashville is 1 KW at
night, 2 tower directional, and I'm 30 miles outside downtown Nashville,
and I can here them at night, but THEY have a FM translator.  They are
NOT classified as an daytimer or day time only operation.
  This translator was put in place in the early 90's when the former
owner complained of Cuban interference. Well, here we are 16 years
later, NO CUBAN INTERFERENCE in Nashville on 1160 and they still have
that 98.7 FM translator to use at night!
   This is totally unfair where stations like WENO (760, daytime only),
WNSG (880 daytime only), or WNAH (1360, 1 KW Day, 27 watts at night)
more qualify for the translator then WCRT-AM does.
   Now tell me, has somebody looked into this?  Why should Bott have
this when they have 1 KW at night, protected in Nashville! 

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of WFIFeng at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:54 AM
To: broadcast at radiolists.net
Subject: [BC] X-lators for Daytimers (WAS:NAB Newsletter)

In a message dated 07/19/2006 08:05:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
SBailey at nespower.com writes:

> Willie,
>     I think the whole idea is to do away with analog AM. This will
force
>  the listeners of WFIF to buy an IBOC Radio to hear you.

That's why there's been so much discussion about replacing so many
millions 
of radios! 

I've seen some argue that we didn't need to *replace* AM radios when FM
came 
out, and yes... that's true! *BUT* it is only true because when FM came
out, 
it did *not* obliterate the AM band with high-powered noise generators!
As more 
and more FM stations went on the air, existing AM radios were just as
useful, 
and existing AM signals (even the weaker ones) were still just as
listenable. 
Throw enough IBUZ signals on the air and the whole band becomes useless
to 
analog-only radios, thus *mandating* their replacement.

Once again, John Q. Public is going to say "What's in it for me?" then
just 
crank up their iPods.

>  I'm sure by the
>  time this happens, you will be able to get to Wal-Mart and by a IBOC
AM
>  Radio for about 20 bucks.

Well, even at $20, I just don't see the AM band being very conducive to
a 
data format, be it IBUZ or DRM. (Tho DRM seems better able to handle
skywave 
effects.) This band is best suited to long-range & skywave propagation.

>     Also, I've scan read this Willie, but I hear the NAB wants to see
us
>  daytimers get FM Translators to cover what the little area we can't
>  cover at night.

I was under the impression that this was as good as absolute taboo. Good
to 
see some rumor of the changing of minds, here. I hope it happens!

>  I know your not suppose to be on at all a night, but
>  don't worry, if this gets pushed through, WFIF will get a FM
translator
>  for nighttime operation.

This would be an answer to not only our prayers, but those of many of
our 
listeners. Year after year, we get inquiries as to why we have to leave
the air 
so early every fall. (Obviously these are *new* listeners!) 

There are some stations in this area that have (IMHO) far too many 
translators, which are well within said stations own primary coverage.
(I can hear them 
on several places on the dial, in addition to their main & high-power
repeater 
signals.) Give some of those frequencies to LPFM stations and the rest
to us 
Daytimers. (We're not the only Daytimer who'd pounce on such an
opportunity!)

>    This rule should apply to "Stand Alone AM Daytimers", like mine and
>  yours, not AM's with sister FM's!

Agreed, 100%. There are several Daytimers in this area who fit that
category. 
I think that stations with pittance night power should also get an FM
x-lator 
frequency.

Willie...
_______________________________________________

Do you have a BDR? http://www.oldradio.com/bdr.htm