[EAS] Kerrville and Ruidoso
Barry Mishkind
barry at oldradio.com
Fri Jul 11 16:55:30 CDT 2025
Listening to the people on the ground today - as opposed to "sources"
- sure gives some different views of the two recent floods. After a
week, perhaps it is time to consider what we *know* and what we do not.
1. The NWS - whether you agree with them or not - gave plenty of
warning that bad weather was afoot.
a. Yes, the NWS could have - and should have - connected
with the FEMA and IPAWS.
They didn't, and it looks like they will not leave the
silo in the near future.
A few WFOs do communicate with SECCs and LECCs. Not
enough, but some.
b. The NWS continues message flooding.
This is a longstanding issue that - like some state
organizations - have produced
so many alerts that people stop listening. In one town,
a station provided me
with a file - seven pages - of alerts sent over three
days. Part of the flooding
is driven by the idiotic FIPS system.
c. The NWS typically suggests people look at their website
for information -
... assuming people can find it. And there is power for
their computers
and the Internet.
Hooray the NWS did not leave people wondering.
Boo! that there is no mechanism to prevent excessive
breaking into a
radio station's programming, *unless* the station
takes their EAS
machine out of "automatic" and actually collates and broadcasts
information in good time.
2. Many (most?) of the NWS alerts made it to the WEA networks.
a. the policy in the camps was "no cell phones" ...
b. Even those that had cell phones might not have had
sufficient signal coverage in these flood areas.
c. At 1AM and 4AM, those with cell phones might
have them on chargers - or otherwise not be
able to hear them - if there was signal.
d. Many cell phone users have tired of the number
of alerts, many of them in the middle of the
night because of misuse by some agencie that
constantly alert that someone went missing several
hundred miles away. They turned *off* the alerts.
e. While I do not know the exact timing, we hear
that the power was cut during the storm. That
kills websites,
3. EAS - there has been so much pressure that AM in every
vehicle is necessary for communication in
emergencies.
a. We still see far too many stations that do not
forward alerts. In both Kerrville and Ruidoso it
appears that there were stations serving the
community. Why the news media usually
mentions only NWS and WEA, but not EAS
may be a reflection on GMs and PDs that
do not care for EAS.
b. The stations in the recent flood zones
stayed on the air and gave information,
assuming the kids could get their nose
out of tiktok. But a good question is:
what are the stations doing to get the
kids to care about them?
A station without generators is virtually
useless in a severe emergency. It does
seem at least some in Kerrville and
Ruidoso either had gennys or did not
lose utility power. Bravo to them
c. Like cell phones, an EAS alert at
4AM would be mostly useless unless
someone was up and listening.
d. Those stations that serve the PICON
deserve praise.
4. There is said to be a "phone tree" from camp
to camp to alert the neighbors. Could the
camps be alerted? If the telephones
were VoIP and power failed ... that might
be a problem.
5. Anyone can say sirens were/are the answer. There
apparently are several reasons why there
were none.
6. What else should we know/learn?
More information about the EAS
mailing list