[EAS] Time to make the LP daisy chain an option
Rod Zeigler
rzeigler at krvn.com
Sun Sep 1 20:18:42 CDT 2019
A few observations from posts in this thread.
In putting together an acceptable State Plan here in Nebraska LP's were
eliminated due to lack of voluntary participation in strategic places,
lack of stations in a large area of the state, and the use of internet
fed alerts where these gaps existed. My first priority was getting two,
separate, RF delivered Federal monitoring sources, PEP's if you will.
Due to nighttime patterns and the daytime noise floor none of the PEP's
in or bordering the state were acceptable for reliable 24/7 coverage for
most of the state. From that came the idea of using Sirius/XM, Premiere,
and NPR as a second source. Since the State Relay is our state owned and
NPR affiliated public radio and TV network, that has been used as a
primary State and Federal source, it stayed as the primary Federal
source. It is a Spoke and Hub topography with a waiver from the FCC to
operate from a single EAS box. This scheme proved its worth during the
last NPT as one of the SR transmitters was down and Sirius/XM filled the
gap.
One very good reason that AM's are used for most of the PEP's is that
you get the most coverage area for the least amount of input power. One
of the biggest problems in a disaster is keeping power going to an
operating transmitter site. The number of FM's it would take to cover
the same area is exponentially larger and financially impossible to
implement and maintain. There are a very few FM PEP's, but those are
special cases meant to fill coverage gaps.
State plans can have internet feeds since these are overseen by the
State and do not have the same prohibitions as a Federal EAN source has.
This is why we have IPAWS and its subsequent use by State/Local/Tribal
authorities. Internet sources should be used as much as possible by
these entities leaving the RF sources for those times when the internet
is not available.
PEP use is dictated by conditions of the utilities in a given area. This
is why there was no EAN during 9/11. The infrastructure was not damaged
significantly and information was being disseminated by multiple
avenues. This is also why the noise floor becomes close to
inconsequential should the PEP system ever have to be lit up. No
utilities means a much lower or close to nonexistent floor. Individual
PEP sites have been pressed into service for local/regional events due
to damage in those areas, but PEP's outside of the area were not
utilized as such at the same time.
Getting into the use of alerts by those agencies authorized to originate
them is luckily not in the purview of SECC's or LECC's. However they can
be resources for those alerting agencies if a good relationship is
created and maintained. I liken it to SECC's and LECC's being a freight
line. We pick up the freight and take it to where it needs to go. It
isn't up to us what is in the boxes, but we can suggest palletizing them
and wrapping them with plastic so they get to where they are going in
one piece.
I concur that daisy chains need to be eliminated where they can be and
reduced to the fewest hops where they can't. We have a lot of changes
coming down the pike with ATSC 3.0 and the changing satellite situation.
It would be a good idea to keep these in mind when looking over your
State Plan's when it comes time to put them into the Online State Plan
database.
--
R. V. Zeigler, Dir. of Eng.
Nebraska Rural Radio Assn.
KRVN AM & FM KAMI
Chairman, Ne. SECC
Exec. Dir. NEBA
www.krvn.com
More information about the EAS
mailing list