[EAS] "improving" EAS?
Dave Kline
dkline at tvmail.unomaha.edu
Fri Jul 13 08:29:49 CDT 2018
Fine print. "up to 24-hours to report... AFTER IT'S DISCOVERED."
So no. You wouldn't have to check the log each day.
You are required to review the log on a weekly basis.
If during that review, which most likely wouldn't happen until sometime during the following week, you discover a false alert was sent, then you have twenty-four hours from that point. Right?
Of course, it is quite unlikely that a false alert would go un-noticed for that long.
Ring Ring
Hello
Hi, this Joe over at KEAS-FM, did you just send out a missile alert?
OH S***!
Now you have twenty-four hours.
But yeah! I agree with you that the more crap the feds throw on the EAS pile, the more stations will back away from all but the mandatory alerts.
----------------------------------------
Dave Kline
----------------------------------------
On Jul 13, 2018, at 7:38 AM, tpt at sevenrangesradio.com wrote:
>A brand new reason why stations may choose not to relay most EAS messages is being considered by Congress. From an Inside Radio article this morning:
>"The most significant move is designed to correct some of the flaws in the system exposed by the false_missile_alert in Hawaii earlier this year. The FCC adopted an order that gives any EAS participant including any radio and TV stations up to 24-hours to report to the FCC's operation center after it's discovered they transmitted or sent a false alert to the public.
More information about the EAS
mailing list