[EAS] Making a better alerting system

[Dave Kline]

I'm sure management would just love to have multi[le alerts in the same county for the same storm.
And you are right about the midwest storms. Some nights things get rockin' and rollin' here and you can kiss watching anything on network TV the rest of the night because we have multiple station falling all over each other trying to be the first or the best at letting you know what's going on.
Not that that's a bad thing for warning.

----------------------------------------
Dave Kline 
----------------------------------------

On Jul 27, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Tim Stoffel wrote:

>With weather events though, usually its known which direction something is moving and how fast, so an alert might cover the current and next cell it is expected to move into. For the most part, severe weather conditions, such as tornados or strong storm cells doesn't usually persist very long (except in the Midwest). And, not all weather advisories would have to be that specific, if conditions warrant that. Adrienne's point about large Western counties is also well-taken. The downfall of this, of course is in-band signaling, which is also one of its strengths ;)

>Tim Stoffel

>--

>-----Original Message-----
>From: EAS [mailto:eas-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Dave Kline

>Actually, I think with weather it would be harder to employ sub-counties just because weather is, for the most part, a large scale event AND a moving target.
>Imagine getting four different TORs for the same Tornado for one county, not to mention the county that the Tornado was in before or after the current one.
>I think the sub-county alerts would be better suited to something like a train derailment/toxic spill type event. But the use of sub-counties would also have to consider the size of the county.
>----------------------------------------
>Dave Kline   
>----------------------------------------