[EAS] List of EAS State Plans

[Ed Czarnecki]

Dave - the expected path for an EAN is still the PEP/EAS relay.  The rules state that you need at least two EAS monitoring assignments, plus IPAWS OPEN (internet).

IPAWS could issue an EAN via CAP with an audio file, just as with the NPT.  However everything they've said today indicates that an EAN or even an EAN test would be over the PEP system. 

Edward Czarnecki, Ph.D.
Senior Director - Strategic and Government Affairs
Monroe Electronics Inc. / Digital Alert Systems

ed.czarnecki at monroe-electronics.com
585-765-2254 | fax 585-765-9330
Reston VA | Lyndonville NY

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

From: Dave Kline
tvmail.unomaha.edu>
radiolists.net>
radiolists.net>
tvmail.unomaha.edu>

Clay,

In Nebraska, and Rod Ziegler can speak better to this than can I, we have a pretty reliable legacy EAS system that is distributed statewide via the FM stations of Nebraska Educational Telecommunications aka NET. In Omaha, the largest population center in the state, I take care of the FM station owned and operated by the University of Nebraska Omaha, different licensees but very much connected when it comes to EAS. We have a direct line to the state primary feed as does all of NET stations. My station serves as the SR for the Omaha Metro area.

Now my understanding is that the FCC requires a secondary path for EAN?
The primary path is the FEMA's IPAWS. Right?
We are already using the statewide system of interconnected non-comm FM stations as a statewide network.
We don't have a satellite system in place that can be used, or would be practical for all stations.
NET has long since abandoned their Sat distribution network for IP distribution.
Rod's station is the PEP for Nebraska. It is a 50KW AM directional/night station.

It seems that the Nebraska path to anointment would be for ALL stations in the state to include monitoring the PEP directly.
This is one of the plans that I've heard getting a lot of love from someone at the FCC.
And while on paper it may be doable at some expense and considerable trouble to stations, it seems that the only reason we are being asked to jump through this hoop is to satisfy the FCC need for a secondary EAS path without much regard to it being practical. I am not, in any way condemning Rod or the rest of the SECC. It just seems that if the fed wants a backup path for the right reasons rather than to just dangle the carrot of officialness, they should be bringing something to the table to help that happen.

The FCC does not like the idea of using the internet for that back door path. They are already using it for our connection to FEMA. Therefore any state cap system seems out of the question. I get that. But here is what I've been harping about in other recent emails. The fed wants to put everything on the backs of the broadcaster and shoulder none of the burden. It just seems wrong to require all of this for a secondary path for legacy system just to satisfy the desire of someone in DC, at broadcasters expense, for a plan that arguably is not even required, and certainly not enforceable against an entity such as an SECC.

A couple of times a year, our RMTs are originated and distributed via NWS.
Unless I am wrong, it seems that we already have a secondary path for EANs that everyone is already monitoring.
If the fed wants this then why can't the fed take a stronger role in it and utilize what is already in place and proven to work.

Here is what I see actually happening if all NE stations are required to monitor the PEP.
Rather than engineer a proper AM receive antenna system and hope to get a usable signal from up to hundreds of miles away, many stations will just plug into the PEP station's web stream. And guess what? The very internet that the FCC didn't want us to use will be the primary receive mode for a secondary path for a legacy system.

Dave Kline

On Aug 21, 2017, at 8:35 PM, Clay Freinwald wrote:

>Rod - A couple of thoughts from the PNW Peanut Gallery -

>>There are a number of sources for EAN's -

>>>PEP Station
>>>Affiliated NPR Station
>>>Premier Satellite Network
>(We use them all in WaState)

The EAS Forum Discussion List is hosted by the BWWG (Broadcast Warning Working Group). http://eas.radiolists.net
Please invite your friends to join our Forum! The sign up is at: http://lists.radiolists.net/mailman/listinfo/eas