[EAS] Source of the "scary" text in Suffolk Co
Sean Donelan
sean at donelan.com
Thu Sep 8 13:52:20 CDT 2016
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Ed Czarnecki wrote:
> However, I'm more cautious about national event codes though both NPT and
> EAN). There is a black and white rule on "immediacy" here. OK, not quite
> black and white ... perhaps dark-gray to light-gray... Would a 2-second,
> 1-second or less delay be not "immediate" enough? A rule clarification, as
> you suggest, might be desirable in these cases, but hopefully would not
> result in a major proceeding. Again, what is "immediately" upon receipt?
> Are a few moments to buffer and now to double check a CAP source allowable?
> How many "moments"?
Putting on my ANSI/ISO standards lawyer imaginary hat (I am not a lawyer):
In 1994, when EAS was first specified by the FCC, it included manual
operation by a human operator. In 1994, it also still included the
infamous Red Envelope. In 1994, the term "immediate" must have been long
enough for a human to open the red envelope, and check the authenticator
word.
The FCC eliminated the red envelope, but kept the option for "manual"
operation of the EAS. Because the FCC rules still allow manual operation
even for an EAN, any FCC defintion of "immediate" must be considered in a
human time-scale, not just a computer time-scales. Humans do not react
in micro-seconds. It takes humans seconds to minutes to react.
Since all EAS equipment must have a minimum of two minute streaming audio
buffer, let me argue:
Immediate means the complete EAN message must be re-broadcast "live" from
the beginning to the end; and any buffering or delays (operator or
automation) must not to exceed the two minute audio buffer (or less)
required in the FCC rules. No you can't just make your audio buffer
bigger, and get a longer delay (intentional South Park reference).
Other transmission media delays such digital encoding delays, switching
delays, etc. didn't exist in 1994. So I would argue as long as they are
"inherent" in the transmission media. As long as they are not different
for a "live" national transmission, i.e. no tape-delay for the West
Coast, digital transmission encoding delays aren't included just
like the satellite hop delay.
As always, the FCC disagrees there is any ambiguity with its rules, and
declines to clarify or answer questions about them.
More information about the EAS
mailing list