[EAS] Manual Relay and Immediacy

[Rich Parker]

FWIW, in one of the CSRIC's I was privileged to participate in,  I
made a comment that one of the 'problems' is that typically there is
little to no room for 'errors' in that the Enforcement bunch seem to
seize on every opportunity for revenue enhancement - which works
against any meaningful 'truthful' reporting, and correcting of errors.

I'm not sure what the disconnect has been, but it does seem that some
of the communications lately have leaned towards ensuring folks that
this will 'not' be an 'enforcement opportunity' - so that's
encouraging, because without that confidence, no one is going to want
to report anything that might get them in trouble - even if they had
the 'best of intentions' to do things right.

-rp

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Sean Donelan <sean at donelan.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2016, Mike McCarthy wrote:
>> Let me make this argument moot. I have said this all along: Relying on the
>> internet and commercial IP infrastructure for mission critical functions,
>> such as public safety, is a false sense of security. It's not the fiber
>
> Without knowing what's in FEMA's concept of operations plan, I have no
> idea how it plans to operate on a very bad day.  It may use the Paul
> Revere system, and dispatch riders on horse back.
>
> Trying to reverse engineer the unpublished White House and FEMA
> requirements from the FCC rules doesn't work very well, as this thread
> demonstrates.
>
> __________________________________________________________
> The EAS Forum Discussion List is hosted by the BWWG (Broadcast Warning Working Group). http://eas.radiolists.net
> Please invite your friends to join our Forum! The sign up is at: http://lists.radiolists.net/mailman/listinfo/eas
> ___________________________________________________________
>