[EAS] New EAS NPRM now posted on the EAS Forum Website
Barry Mishkind
barry at oldradio.com
Mon Jun 30 12:13:39 CDT 2014
At 09:17 AM 6/30/2014, Kelly D. Alford wrote:
>Looking up the food chain, station owners nor programmers probably differentiate the roles between CAP and EAS, let alone whatever individual state involvement, when it comes to nationwide bad publicity from blunders like the zombie apocalypse or national testing follies.
Perhaps one of the major problems
with the EAS has been the virtual complete
lack of participation from management
and programming - aside from saying
"Get that stuff off my air" and "the
engineer will handle it."
As Clay has said, there is a wide range of
outcomes, if only a little effort is put toward
doing more than rejecting EAS as a "joke."
Operationally, sure, it all seems a lot harder
to non-tech folks. The EAS is more difficult
than it needs to be, for several reasons. But,
like programming a computer, while the
learning curve is sharp, it does get easy with use.
Again, among the biggest problems with EAS,
is the generally total lack of commitment from
management and programming - even to the
point of saying what they would like to have
the system do. If they gave 1/20 the time and
attention the tech folks did, we might have
quite a different rollout and many fewer issues.
How many managers or programmers do you think
went to www.theBDR.net/articles/fcc/eas/eas.html
and read the NPRM? Any of it? (Yes, the FCC seems
to have moved the URL around a bit on this one, but
the link on the EAS page works.)
> They just know, and unfortunately so do their viewers and listeners, a system that we're required to have operational under a federal mandate is, for whatever reason, often ineffective and unreliable.
And it could be effective and reliable. But not
if it is left to the tech folks who can make it
work alone, but cannot make it effective on
their own.
More information about the EAS
mailing list