[EAS] NWS Impact Based Warnings
Barry Mishkind
barry at oldradio.com
Thu Feb 7 12:31:06 CST 2013
At 10:48 AM 2/7/2013, Adrienne Abbott Gutierrez wrote:
>We still haven't found the
>right combination of technology and language to convey timely and accurate
>warning information that will move people who are in denial to action.
Actually, we had found it, we used it, and were well
regarded for doing so. Then automation hit. News
staffs were cut, then eliminated. The few staffers
still around cared only about the next "hit" record.
Then Full Automation took over and we now have
clusters with studios in a line - all uninhabited.
Most broadcasters, in the name of profit, have shot themselves
in the foot. The few who continue to look at an EAS
activation as the doorbell to gather information and
put it on their have the respect of their listeners.
Those who merely leave the system on automatic
all day long ... and either broadcast the "flood" of
messages or none at all. They are the ones that
make the process harder.
And then we have cable news with their
"wicked weather" and "Storm of the century" and
"Stormopolypse" style horrid gossip - I won't
even call it reporting - which make the process almost
impossible. Look at the garbage predictions for
the NE today... snow is going to cover the
tallest buildings, if you believe them.
Unless and until broadcast companies - as an
industry - return to the concept of "Public Service"
even when it reduces their profits by 2% we will
see continued erosion of the value and
effectiveness of the warning systems.
Look how people were crowing today about that
person who got the tornado warning on
her cell phone and had no idea where it was.
She stopped. But how many others drove right
into the storm, because the best that broadcasters
can do is "... the northeast corner of Miller County"?
FIPS was outdated in 1997. CMAS Country alerts
are already shown to be all but outdated and useless,
especially in the West. There is technology to do better.
Cell phones can be programmed closer in. Broadcasters
can stop being idiots and either broadcasting warnings
for huge coverage areas without specificity or run
automated and be less than useless.
There are too many "kingdoms" within the emergency
management community. A few areas "get it" and
cooperate ... far too many more still think reverse 911
is the answer.
Broadcast could become an immediate solution. But
the reality is that few broadcasters really care, aside
from voicing frustration at the current - broken - system.
PS ... and don't forget the analysis of the National EAS
Test, currently slated for publication ... oh, sorry ...
we have no idea when that will be.
More information about the EAS
mailing list