[EAS] Voluntary Local EAS Carriage: Can We All Take Two Steps Forward?

[Dave Turnmire]

One comment regarding your posting.  You mentioned "Codes for local high 
risk, high probability...".  While the reason for the "local high risk" 
codes are evident... why the concern about restricting it to "high 
probability"?  If it is low probability, but still high risk... why 
shouldn't that also be aired?  The very fact that it is low probability 
means it is unlikely to have an adverse affect on broadcast air space.  
The fact that it is "high risk" is why it is worth interrupting our air 
space in the first place.  Am I missing something in your reasoning?

Dave Turnmire
Idaho

On 2/14/2012 2:18 PM, Richard_Rudman wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I just posted a new article on the EAS Forum that tries to answer a question many of us have been asking.
>
> Since Governor Must Carry was eliminated in the FCC's Fifth Report and Order, is there a way to encourage more of those subject to Part 11 to voluntarily carry EAS warnings?
>
> The BWWG thinks there is.
>
...