[EAS] GMC

[Mike McCarthy]

I didn't suggest otherwise.  The FEMA CAP/IPAWS system is still in it's 
embryonic stages.  Plus many states don't have plans for CAP servers.  
My guess is the FEMA system will be the **only** system and the states 
will feed up as opposed to feed down.

Your comment about changing levels of support and firmware is but one 
reason we forewent the installation of the new boxes.  There is simply 
too much in motion.

MM

On 11/16/2011 12:17 PM, Harold Price wrote:
> Mike,
>
> In fact, part of the conformity assessment program test was to show
> that the device could properly handle the Must Carry tag, independent
> of any particular delivery system.  At the time the test was run, the
> IPAWS 3.0 server wasn't even running.
>
> Speaking of the IPAWS ATOM server, I've got an ENDEC connected to
> FEMA's test IPAWS OPEN 3.0 ATOM sever, 19,760 polls issued in the
> last 6.8 days, all responded to, 340 alerts received and logged (I'm
> running the filter wide open, regular users won't be).  Sharks with
> helmet mounted lasers have been spotted.
>
> I didn't want to roll out our support for IPAWS 3.0 in the middle of
> the run up to the EAN, but the IPAWS ATOM cap delivery is
> working.  Hopefully the FCC is hard at work on its part of the puzzle.
>
> Harold
>
> At 12:24 PM 11/16/2011, Ed Czarnecki wrote:
>> can be supported directly through a "native"
>> state CAP system, and not necessarily gated through IPAWS.
> _______________________________________________
> This is the EAS Forum Discussion List
>
> Please invite your friends to join our Forum!
> http://lists.radiolists.net/mailman/listinfo/eas
>
> And, remember the main page: http://eas.radiolists.net
>