[EAS] National Test Length
Harold Price
hprice at sagealertingsystems.com
Fri Nov 4 10:39:04 CDT 2011
The EAN test has been reduced to 30 seconds. There is much grumbling
about the fact that a unique aspect of the EAN is that it can last
longer than two minutes, and the Nov 9 test was supposed to show
this, but now it won't. It doesn't make the current test worthless, however.
There have been several reasons to do the test. The list below does
not necessarily reflect the FCC or FEMA stated reasons. This is just me.
1) The EAS system is supposed to be ready to send an EAN at any time.
It has never been tested in that way. It is reasonable to do
so. Conelrad had tests (that involved some stations shutting down
for 1/2 hour, and others changing frequencies). EBS had tests,
including one infamous live test: listen to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu4r79l8P8I, a very professional job
by the announcer, IMHO, with one excusable break about 5:00 into the
recording. It is reasonable to do a full up test of EAS/EAN.
2) Test the connectivity from the EAN source all the way out to the
end of the relay tree. Illuminate the holes, limitations, and short
comings, and start the process of improvement.
3) Raise awareness of the EAN in the broadcast community. Give
everyone some education on the differences between a normal RMT and
the EAN. Force some updates to old handbooks, get a best practices
manual done. There is nothing like a high profile deadline to focus
everyone's attention.
4) Get broadcasters to think about how to recover from a partial EAN.
5) Use the peer pressure of missing this big event to get stations
that haven't looked at their EAS equipment since 1997 to dust off
equipment and training.
5) Test the longer than two-minute aspects. Out of all of the above,
this is the only item that can (and has been) tested in the
lab. While I regret the loss of this field data, accepting that loss
is far better than canceling the entire test.
Even though the change was mandated from way up high, the FCC staff
that works with EAS directly got the word out quickly, working the
phones and sending emails, as well as using their normal public
disclosure tools. They updated the handbook quickly. Kudos for that.
Ramblings for a Friday.
Harold
More information about the EAS
mailing list