[EAS] Good thing the test was shortened

[Dave Kline]

Hi Harold,

I don't see any need for an apology.
I didn't have all of my facts quite right either, hence my second "Ooops" post to clarify.
Which I would not have done if you hadn't spoken to the subject.
Then as I wrote that second post I had more questions come to mind which I included.
You then had subsequent information to ad to the discussion
The important thing is that the discussion took place and I think we all learned something.
To me, this is exactly why we have this forum.

Well done, Harold.

Dave

************************************************
Dave Kline   UNO-TV / KVNO
University of Nebraska at Omaha
6001 Dodge St. Omaha, NE  68182  CPACS 200
************************************************

On Nov 4, 2011, at 12:16 AM, H.A. Stanton wrote:

> I perchance spoke too soon regarding the EAN/EAT/EOM.
> Darryl Parker tells me that the system, once triggered by an WAN
> then constantly scans inputs looking for an EAT and then the EOM
> attendant to the EAT. This should stop the unending EAN. This is
> good planning for a second chance stopping. Long as the EAT/EOM
> get thru unfettered. So I stand corrected and am passing along the
> info so that we can all be up-to-date. My apologies.
>   Harold
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the EAS Forum Discussion List
> 
> Please invite your friends to join our Forum!
> http://lists.radiolists.net/mailman/listinfo/eas
> 
> And, remember the main page: http://eas.radiolists.net
> 
> 
>