[EAS] CAP Polling Interval Questions
Harold Price
hprice at sagealertingsystems.com
Wed May 11 09:09:33 CDT 2011
At 01:53 AM 5/11/2011, Alex Hartman wrote:
>After answering my own question with a bit of research on IPAWS, i see
>the whole system is designed backwards. Entirely backwards.
Keep in mind that IPAWS isn't the whole system. IPAWS is the federal
part, designed for the EAN message from the President. It is also
the CMAS aggregator - and from what I've been told, that's the way
the cell phone companies wanted it - centralized.
We focus on IPAWS sometimes because they defined (with the FCC) the
protocols broadcasters are going to use - CAP Protocol, IPAWS
Profile, ECIG Implementation Guide. These are the protocols for
IPAWS, but they are available for anyone else to use. IPAWS will
have a server architecture, and an access method, but that isn't
necessary what the states will use.
The IPAWS server *can* be used by States, it does not *have* to be
used by states. Washington State, for example, is using CAP for
alert distribution, and they are not using the IPAWS server. They
might cross post, they might not.
Harold
More information about the EAS
mailing list