[EAS] Activity at the FCC

[Eric Adler]

Thank you Richard,

Digging in to this a bit, in the available IPAWS documents from fema.gov, I see very few internet/IP references.  I see two in the "CAP IPAWS FAQ" answers, one that appears to dodge the question "Does CAP require an internet connection?" by using the wording "may be pulled (...) via an internet connection"; another states "Message delivery using CAP via Internet Protocol is proposed as a supplementary layer of message dissemination.". 

Full IPAWS OPEN 2.0 documentation doesn't appear to be available (at least, not easily).  

Eric

Sent from my BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Rudman <rar01 at me.com>
Sender: "eas-bounces at radiolists.net" <eas-bounces at radiolists.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:19:08 
To: The EAS Forum - accurate and up-to-date information on the EAS and itsimplementation<eas at radiolists.net>
Reply-To: The EAS Forum - accurate and up-to-date information on the EAS and
 its implementation <eas at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [EAS] Activity at the FCC

CAP says nothing about IP protocols.

CAP is no more and no less than a subset of the XML markup language, so I think of CAP as "data."

So, since CAP by any other name is data, IPv6 capability would have to be a part of what various CAP message aggregators push out and what the push through to get to entry points,  and what various EAS entry points have as connections.

Richard Rudman
=====
On Jan 22, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Eric Adler wrote:

> Speaking of technology lock-in: Do the current standards allow and/or require IPv6 support?
> 
> Eric
> Sent from my BlackBerry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Adrienne  Abbott" <nevadaeas at charter.net>
> S
_______________________________________________
This is the EAS Forum Discussion List

Please invite your friends to join our Forum!
http://lists.radiolists.net/mailman/listinfo/eas

And, remember the main page: http://eas.radiolists.net