On Wednesday 20 November 2013 09:34:58 am Mike McCarthy wrote: > I guess less isn't more.... > All I remember about "less is more" was 8 30's instead of 4 60's, creating a much higher annoyance factor. In my mind, "less is more" would be running 1 spot for $100 instead of running 100 spots for $1 each. ( but what do I know ? ) -- Cowboy