[BC] The things licensees get away with...
Cowboy
curt at spam-o-matic.net
Tue Feb 28 09:25:23 CST 2012
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 09:57:19 am Sid Schweiger wrote:
> Nothing new. The question "was everything required to be in the public file, placed there on time?" has been around for several renewal cycles and has, no doubt, resulted in a number of licensees committing perjury on their renewal applications.
>
> "Honesty is the best policy," anyone?
Used to be.
Was a time when one could commit to writing that such and such a rule
was violated, and here's what we've done to insure it won't happen again,
and be OK with it.
Now-a-days it's literally impossible to not be in violation of *something*
at any given moment.
Too much government with too much power.
It does seem that the objective has shifted from compliance to financial
punishment, which makes compliance irrelevant, and avoiding punishment
by any means, everything, which ( of course ) encourages non-compliance
one way or another.
--
Cowboy
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list