[BC] STL recommendations in the year 2012

[Mike McCarthy]

On 2/25/2012 10:20 PM, Alex Hartman wrote:
>Persistence is key when doing coordination with ISM links. If they

Alex,

I'm glad you have the time to commit to that level of self-coordination in the Part 15 bands. But as I mentioned, all it takes is one yahoo. And there is little/no recourseif the latest entrant creates problems. BTDT.  The more densely populated the area, the greater the chances of significant problems.  Last time I was there, Houston was as densely populated and any other major market.

Now, if you're in a more rural area, then what you suggest might work over long distances.  But from my perspective, why risk it for a mission critical link in a major market? That's very different than a short hop of say a mile or less where the chance of IX is reduced.

I will look at the Invictus stuff.  Thanks for the lead.  My ego is such that I never turn down an opportunity to learn something.  And it's a good day when that happens.

MM