[BC] WideOrbit Automation
SteveOrdinetz
hykker at wildblue.net
Thu Feb 11 19:47:13 CST 2010
I've been using Google Radio Automation for about a year and a half
at one of my sites. All in all, it's pretty solid. I have one PD
who manages to crash it occasionally, but for the most part it runs
well. I don't think I've had to reboot the server except when I've
done MS updates...this compared to the old Scott dispatch that needed
it weekly.
One of the stations is a news-talker that's probably 90% satellite,
with a large number of sources. It handles 2 BTools 16x4 switchers
no problem. Writing templates is a snap...the PD picked it up in no
time. The airstaff seems to like it, much more than the Maestro that
it replaced.
My biggest complaint, one that Wide Orbit seems to not want to deal
with is the lack of a good production workstation audio interface
(ie-a simple, intuative way do dub in audio). They insist on using a
kluged version of Adobe Audition 3. Our programming/production staff
HATED it. The installer ended up using a slightly hacked version of
TLC (which is what our programming people used with SS32). It's not
completely compatible, and I understand even less compatible with
newer builds of GRA, but it gets the job done. I understand the
rationale behind using AA since production staffers are already
familiar with it, but the GRA interface is clunky and only one-way
(ie- no easy way to search for existing audio by title/artist (or
client name). I'm also opposed since it's too easy to do the actual
production in GRA instead of the production computer, and eating up
drive space with various workparts.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list