[BC] BUREAU ADOPTS ORDER TO MODIFY FM DIGITAL

Jerry Mathis thebeaver32 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 1 11:10:25 CST 2010


You're ignoring or forgetting the fact(s) that the suggested primary use of the Channels 5 & 6 additon is to provide a place for **AM** stations to migrate to, and in an all digital format. This would be followed by moving short-spaced stations into it. This is BEFORE any NEW stations are allowed to use the space.
 
--
Jerry Mathis

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Broadcast List USER <Broadcast at fetrow.org> wrote:
>Jim:

>I totally agree, but there are those who want to take TV Channels five
>and six and add that 12 MHz to the 20 MHz of the FM band.

>I just don't get it.  Let's make the business less profitable.  Let's
>spread the business over more than 50% more stations!

>Now, if we expanded maybe three MHz down, and got rid of the short
>spaced interference problems that plague the NE US, the Chigao area,
>and southern CA, I might support that, but more 50% more FM stations
>in middle market areas?  No way.

>Frankly 80-90 is part of the problem today.

>It is time to let the weak stations die, and allow the stronger ones
>to improve their signals and MAYBE survive.

>--chip



More information about the Broadcast mailing list