[BC] Watch the (not) airplane traffic live over Europe.

[Goran Tomas]

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:18 PM,  <RichardBJohnson at comcast.net> wrote:
> When the global warming theories were first proposed, a professor at a university in Oregon asked me to write a driver for an A/D board. This was to obtain measurements and produce heating and cooling curves for various atmospheric gases. It turns out that there is nothing special about carbon dioxide. It follows Boyle and Charles's gas laws as expected. It is no different from any diatomic gas like nitrogen and oxygen and, therefore, cannot be a contributor to so-called global warming. Of course, we do not hear about these experiments nor do we see these papers being published. However, there was a committee of concerned scientists, who were bothered by the junk science of global warming. My name is amongst thousands who have signed several petitions.

Richard,

There are many scientific papers written about water vapour and global
warming, but you obviously haven't dug deep enough. Water vapour is
indeed a very potent greenhouse gas, but things are not as simplistic
as it would seem (as engineers, we should know). Please start here:

http://www.grist.org/article/water-vapor-accounts-for-almost-all-of-the-greenhouse-effect

Not wanting to turn this into another global warming debate, I'll
respectfully bow out...

Regards,
Goran Tomas