[BC] Tower Location Change For WLAN 1390

[Broadcast List USER]

Well, except that there is a need for regional or even national  
coverage (not that that can be done by one transmitter in the USA).

Medium Wave broadcasting can cover a large area.

Yep, I can agree that the peanut stations should go away to allow for  
improvements to the national or regional stations, but I am dreaming  
in the US.  In other countries, they do what is right for the public.

--chip

On Apr 16, 2010, at 9:00 AM, broadcast-request at radiolists.net wrote:

> Message: 20
> From: Jerry Mathis <thebeaver32 at gmail.com>
>
> This isn't the answer you want to hear, but this is another GOOD  
> case of why a new VHF broadcast band needs to be created, and Medium- 
> wave broadcast stations need to migrate to it. MW broadcasting takes  
> a lot of real estate for even a single tower when you consider the  
> need for the ground system, and a directional array only compounds  
> the problem by the number of towers required. VHF broadcasting will  
> eliminate the need for multiple towers and nighttime power  
> reductions for AM stations, just as it does for our current FM band.
>
> --
> Jerry Mathis