[BC] The reason for having a carrier

Dale Adkins wini at intrnet.net
Sun Oct 11 11:43:22 CDT 2009


I basically gave up on cooperation after our current bureaucratic county EM 
told us
that it "is not in their protocol to communicate with the public".
He basically sees his relationship to be with FEMA....not the public.
DA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Warren Shulz" <warren.shulz at citcomm.com>

Subject: Re: [BC] The reason for having a carrier

> Barry,
>
> I know of no fix for this distrust.  The aggressive media reporters have
> done the damage and it CANNOT be reversed.  Once burned you respect fire
> forever and will do anything not to be burned again.  My though is only
> if the EM reaches out do you have a chance at a factual dialog.
> Otherwise, forget it... As soon as the EM sees you are associated with
> acknowledge that state plans exist and will never deal with local plans.
>
> Warren Shulz
> IL SECC
>



More information about the Broadcast mailing list