[BC] KWVE redux

[Alan Kline]

Excellent point!

ak

Cowboy wrote:
>  I would argue ( I have in the past, and the argument won ) that the test
>  was SUCCESSFUL !! It successfully did what tests are supposed to do,
>  and exposed a deficiency in the system which, heretofor unknown, can
>  now be fixed, and re-tested next week.
> 
>  To define a violation as a test successfully doing what the test is supposed
>  to do, is ludicrous at best. I'm not even sure what the word is, at worst ?
>