[BC] AM loads

[Gary Glaenzer]

and shouldn't "would be able to detect a 0.7 reduction in signal strength"

read "would be able to detect a 0.3 reduction in signal strength"  ??

Gary

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Gardiner" <DG19075 at aol.com>

> Hmmm.....shouldn't the loss in the second half of the example be  136
> rather than 236 watts?
> -- 
> Dave Gardiner
> 
> 
> 
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com