[BC] Re: RE: That Guy at the PAB who inspected Dana Puopolo's Station

[Alan Alsobrook]

As usual, there is more to the story than the opinion we were given.
As I said in my post if it met part 11 then it should have been a pass. 
It doesn't sound like it met part 11 since it was missing alerts and the 
logs weren't there.

Matthew Lightner wrote:
> The fact is when I inspected the station Pupolo is talking about I looked at
> the EAS logs and found many discrepancies. Many of the received weekly tests
> were missing. I also recall the time was way off on the ENDEC unit. Events
> that should have auto forwarded were expired upon reception according to the
> printouts attached to the EAS logs. So that was the main problems. I did say
> that I felt the unit needed to be at the local studio location. The reason
> behind that was because I think the Barix boxes were cutting out, or were
> set at such a low bitrate that they had problems passing the FSK data from
> the LP1 and LP2 receivers to the remote ENDEC unit. 

-- 
Alan Alsobrook CSRE AMD CBNT
St. Augustine Fl. 32086 904-829-8885
aalso at Bellsouth.net