[BC] 944 MHz Wireless mic systems...

[Phil Alexander]

This goes beyond scary considering they did their
"test" in a market where additional STL's are
virtually impossible.

It is clear they have no understanding of the band
or why it **appears** so clean, and it is not
fiber optics as they think.

To think that Lectrosonics, Shure and Sennheiser
can't understand the implications of making wireless
mikes for the 950 MHz STL band - now that is really
scary. Wait until one of them interrupts the EOM
of an EAS RMT and yaps along on half the stations
in a major market.

Didn't I recently read somewhere that the FCC
was taking another look at wireless mikes?
Could this have been the reason?

---------------------------------------------
Phil Alexander, CSRE, AMD
Broadcast Engineering Services and Technology 
(a Div. of Advanced Parts Corporation) 
Ph. (317) 335-2065   FAX (317) 335-9037


On 1 Sep 2008 at 13:36, Wooten, Charles wrote:

> That is SCARY !!! I wonder what rock the person 
> who wrote that has been living under?
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net on behalf of Burt I. Weiner
> 
> If you use a 950 MHz STL then take a look at the latest Location
> Sound, Inc (LSC) Newsletter for Summer/Fall 2008.  See:
> http://www.locationsound.com/pdf/Newsletter.pdf  Pay particular
> attention to the column, "Important RF Spectrum News"
> 
> Burt