[BC] Vista Vs. XP Vs. Win2k

[Tom]

And the 64-bit version is what no-one has drivers for, yet.  YMMV, but 
Win2K, Penguins, or a trip to the orchard...

Powell E. Way III W4OPW wrote:
> --- Keith Hammond <monsterfm at monsterfm.com> wrote:
>
>   
>>  > On Apr 23, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Paul B. Walker, Jr.
>> wrote:
>>  > > Saying Vista is a joke.. is well, alot kinder
>> then I would be in
>>  > > talking about Vista.
>>  > >
>>  > On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Powell Way, De Tird.
>> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > But you are using the "toy" version of vista.
>> Notice I didn't cap vista.
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul, Powell and others:
>>
>> I don't want to say that you're not all correct but,
>> we switched our
>> Comstudy and office machines over to Vista during
>> last summer. (I haven't
>> had the nerve to try that with automation and
>> production systems - which are
>> running XP Professional - just yet but, it is coming
>> to a time that I'll try
>> it.)
>>
>> So far, I must admit that I am impressed!
>>     
>
>
>
> The home version of Vista, which Paul has, is the
> "toy" version. It's the 32 bit version. The
> profesional versions are 64 bit, and in some cases
> have much better performance than you would imagine. 
>   
-- 
Tom Spencer
PG-18-25453 (nee' P1-18-48841)
http://radioxtz.com/
Part 15 transmitters on AM 640 and FM 100.1