[BC] new equipment...
Paul B. Walker, Jr.
walkerbroadcasting at gmail.com
Sat Oct 27 21:12:30 CDT 2007
Jason:
I am the only person here and the mixer gets used about 3 or 4 times an hour
for 4 hours a day to simply slide the pots up and down.. Imverycareful not
to overuse or abuse it. We run automated 90 percent of our broadcast day 7
days a week.
Trust me, the minute I can afford some better gear... I will definately do
so! I'm just trying to make this palce work with what I got
Paul
On 10/27/07, JYRussell at academicplanet.com <JYRussell at academicplanet.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Paul -
>
> I like Mike's answer - but I also have some "less expensive stuff" in
> use
> a location or two.
>
> I learned that durability is something else to consider.
>
> The "stuff" - the mic, the mix board, the computer, etc. -
> It's all just a bunch of tools.
>
> You get the sound you want out of it all , one way or another, whichever
> tool you use to make that sound, you can find a way. Depends on how hard
> and
> long you work with it.
>
> BUT... Nicer tools can mean a little less work figuring out how to get
> and
> keep that sound, no matter who is using the stuff.
>
> And, Nicer tools can also usually put up with a little more 24/7 wear and
> tear and abuse... (part timers can really physically bash a Behringer!)
>
> For my part, the less expensive stuff is a great way to get started, and,
> as the money comes in, move up as you can - while there's still a lot of
> life left in the Behringers and such... get them ready for the remote
> truck,
> or for backup studios, that sort of thing. Or, sell them, in like-new
> condition.
>
> Either way, you can get your money back out of them again if you treat
> them
> right.
>
> Jason R.
>
> >So buying the fancy stuff doesn't necessarily mean better sound. But it
> does buy more time for you to spend doing more important functions.
>
> MM<
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list