[BC] Re: Skywave dying

[Bailey, Scott]

Right now, the current 700 mile protection contour should be downgraded
to 400 miles.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Mark Durenberger
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 2:34 PM
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [BC] Re: Skywave dying

My estimate is that once a mandatory analog shut-down date is announced 
you'll find a Rule-Making request asking for the current (approx 700
mile) 
protection be considerably downgraded...and there WILL be a lot of new 
stations on the former 'clears'...

.....all of course in the name of diversity.

I have to go take my meds now.  My meds now.  My meds.  my

Mark Durenberger


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Smith W4KNX" <paul at amtower.com>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 1:41 PM
Subject: RE: [BC] Re: Skywave dying


> My feeling is that if the "Clears" dont want to service their nite
time
> protected area, then they should be downgraded to a class B station.
We
> should no longer protect stations that dont want to serve the areas
they
> have protection for
>
> Paul Smith
> Sarasota, FL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
> [mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net]On Behalf Of k7cr
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 11:28 AM
> To: broadcast at radiolists.net
> Subject: [BC] Re: Skywave dying
>
>
> I love to read the coments about Skywave dying as a
> result of the recent IBOC announcement.
>
> Seems to me, looking back, that the FCC started
> this process many years ago when they declared that
> the historic Clear Channels were no longer needed.
>
> What I am saying is - This is nothing new but rather
> a continuation of a long process that is based on the
> contention that you do not need to get your Radio
> from skywave when you can likely get the same
> programming via ground-wave from a local station
> that just happens to be playing the same tune.
>
> Today's Cookie-Cutter Radio is likely a
> contributor to the continuation of this thinking. Not
> to mention the fact that some have derated one
> time big skywave generators just to get more local
> coverage in a large market (no names or calls here)
>
> Bottom line - Don't blame the FCC...Broadcasters
> need to look in the mirror!
>
> Clay Freinwald
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and
More!
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>
> 

_______________________________________________

The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More! 
www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com