[BC] Now targetting TV violence

[Jerry Mathis]

It just means we're sliding further down the slippery slope. They censor
sex, now they want to censor violence. The day is coming when all TV content
will first have to be submitted to the Feds for approval. Is this really
what you want? A government beaurocracy deciding what has "social redeeming
value" and what doesn't? It'll be interesting to see how they rate "The
Passion of the Christ".

Be careful what you wish for. You may get it.

JM


On 3/18/07, WFIFeng at aol.com <WFIFeng at aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> There was a discussion here, some time ago, about the disparity between
> enforcement against "intimate activities" being protrayed openly on TV, vs
> negl
> ect
> of the violence... well, finally, that tide looks like it's about to turn:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2skl5c
>
> Willie...
>
>
>
>
> **************************************
> AOL now offers free email to everyone.
> Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More!
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>


-- 
JM