[BC] Station Rules compliance (AOL Webmail)

Bailey, Scott sbailey
Tue Feb 27 13:58:01 CST 2007


If you own the daytimer and the Class A on the same channel, why can you
not operate the daytimer at night if corporate wishes?

Look what was legally done with WLIB and WOWO. I do think there is a
clause that is open to allow WOWO to be reclassified as a Class A in the
future, or am I wrong about that?

Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Rich Wood
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 1:25 PM
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
Subject: RE: [BC] Station Rules compliance (AOL Webmail)

------ At 09:51 AM 2/27/2007, Bailey, Scott wrote: -------

>Clear Channel owns a daytimer on 780 in Cookeville, TN.  They sign off
>at night to protect WBBM, which is owned by CBS. If I was a betting
man,
>if Clear Channel owned WBBM, you would see the daytimer on 780 in
>Cookeville, TN stay on 24/7. One of their own engineers told me that.

In a time when a company can buy a station and take it silent to 
favor another market, why couldn't a common owner agree to accept the 
interference from the daytimer? I don't like the idea but I wonder 
how many distant listeners have any interest in Chicago news, weather 
and traffic. Of course, I'm assuming the daytimer has a full time 
news staff 24/7 and is providing live and local service to a 
community that, desperately, needs Michael Savage after dark.

Rich


Rich Wood
Rich Wood Multimedia
Phone: 413-454-3258

_______________________________________________

The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More! 
www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com





More information about the Broadcast mailing list