[BC] Station Rules compliance (AOL Webmail)

[Bailey, Scott]

I'm not the one who's whining, I basically could care less. All I'm
saying is we are all going to get interference, so we deal with it and
go on. I'm just trying to point out politics overrides the rules at
times.

-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Kent Winrich
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:18 AM
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [BC] Station Rules compliance (AOL Webmail)

OK enough Scott!  BS!  I used to work for Clear Channel and sticking to
the
rules was JOB ONE.  There is no IF ANDS OR BUTS about it.  You didnt
stick
to the rules you were GONE.  The engineer that told you that is WAY out
of
line.

So stop this whining, pull your head out of the sand, oh and stop your
whining.

And hats off to Gary.  He nailed it.  I truly feel sorry for you that
have
such a negative outlook.  Radio has it problems, but what business
doesnt.

Count me in for the self policing technique.

Kent Winrich



On 2/27/07, Bailey, Scott <sbailey at nespower.com> wrote:
>
> Clear Channel owns a daytimer on 780 in Cookeville, TN.  They sign off
> at night to protect WBBM, which is owned by CBS. If I was a betting
man,
> if Clear Channel owned WBBM, you would see the daytimer on 780 in
> Cookeville, TN stay on 24/7. One of their own engineers told me that.
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
> [mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Jerry Mathis
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 4:37 PM
> To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [BC] Station Rules compliance (AOL Webmail)
>
> Personally, I have no plans to become the radio police. As I work for
> Clear
> Channel, if I had information about another station operating
illegally,
> I
> would contact my RVPE before anyone else. If my employment situation
was
> different, then I would look at protecting whatever radio station(s) I
> worked for. My point was not to become the "Radio Nazi's", but to work
> positively to prevent illegal operation, and help keep the band clean.
> Yes,
> I might even agree to work with a station that needs help to overcome
> illegal operation, assuming they ask me, and are desiring to comply.
But
> I
> would not work for a station that deliberately operates illegally.
Well,
> maybe only if I were starving otherwise  :)  but I would sure take
steps
> to
> CMA.
>
> JM
>
>
> On 2/26/07, Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Jerry:
> >
> > You are correct but I don't think that your employer would
appreciate
> it
> > if you appointed yourself to be the radio police.
> > It could negatively impact some other aspect of their business plans
> you
> > are not aware of.
> >
> > R
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and
More!
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
> Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and
More!
> www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com
>
>
_______________________________________________

The BROADCAST [BC] list is sponsored by SystemsStore On-Line Sales
Cable-Connectors-Blocks-Racks-Wire Management-Test Gear-Tools and More! 
www.SystemsStore.com       Tel: 407-656-3719    Sales at SystemsStore.com